Our Story

From visionary principles to the impact of a global network, the Forum has built a unique architecture bringing together governments, civil society and researchers for a democratic information space.

 

Taking back control of our informational spaces

What's wrong?

In the span of two decades, democratic societies have delegated part of the management of their information ecosystems to private companies.

The CEOs and owners of these platforms have accumulated a level of power capable of destabilizing a state, an election, or a democratic process. A concentration of informational power unlike anything democracies have ever experienced.

In a historic shift, code has become law, stripping parliaments of their role in writing the rules meant to protect the informational space, and denying the justice system the ability to enforce them.

Journalism — a true pillar of trust in democratic societies — is one of the first collateral victims of this new reality.

Why is this a problem?

In these new spaces, lies and propaganda from authoritarian states spread faster than journalistic and scientific content. Facts have given way to rumors.

Access to reliable, pluralistic, and independent information is no longer guaranteed, even as more and more citizens get their news online. Yet access to facts remains a prerequisite for any functioning democracy. It is also essential for humanity’s ability to address the major challenges of our century.

Finally, the inaction of platforms has, in the worst cases, led to endangerment of civilian populations, ethnic clashes, and the spillover of online violence into the offline world.

How to solve the problem?

To address all of these challenges, the NGO Reporters Without Borders (RSF) launched the International Initiative on Information and Democracy in 2018. This initiative is built on three pillars: a set of principles, a coalition of democratic countries, and a mechanism for implementation.

Seventy-five years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, this initiative begins with the definition of new principles for the global information and communication space.

Backed from the outset by 11 heads of state and government, these principles would go on to inspire the International Partnership on Information and Democracy, officially launched by France and its partners in September 2019.

To support the implementation of this framework, RSF and 10 other NGOs and research centers established the Forum on Information and Democracy in November 2019, with the mandate to translate these high-level principles into concrete policy recommendations and action. 

 

Our methodology

The FID is the continuation of the dialectic between civil society (the Commission) and the PID States (the Partnership).

01

An interface between expertise and action

Its methodology is based on its ability to create interfaces between producers of expertise and democratic states wishing to implement the principles of the PID.

02

Bringing communities together

At the intersection of journalism and internet governance, the Forum has always aimed to bring different communities together. Today, we are going further by reaching out to groups working on climate issues, gender equality, etc.

03

All this around a clear mandate

  • Evaluating: the means, norms and architectures of the global information and communication space;
  • Investigating: corporate entities’ behaviour as regards adherence to the principles of the Declaration and Partnership;
  • Making: recommendations to the different stakeholders that shape this space on how the norms should evolve;
  • Facilitating: the emergence of regulatory and self-regulatory responses by and for the different stakeholders;
  • Supporting: the social function of journalism through innovative responses and recommendations;
 

Our assets

An agile permanent secretariat

Based in Paris, the FID’s permanent secretariat coordinates the network and its various communities (explore Our Community). It is composed of:

Our community and partners

The FID would also like to thank its financial partners:

Want to support the Forum?

The Forum on Information and Democracy welcomes contributions from all stakeholders working on shaping a democratic information space.

 

Annual reports

2024 Annual Report: The Year of Information Integrity

The Forum on Information and Democracy is publishing its annual report for the year undeniably under the sign of information integrity. In this report, the organisation looks back on the major achievements of the year, marked by the passing in June 2024 of Christophe Deloire, founder and president of the Forum. The year 2024 marked the 5th anniversary of the Partnership and of the Forum on Information and Democracy. Initiated by Reporters without Borders (RSF) in 2018, this innovative international framework, bringing together States and civil society, has helped advance a pioneering vision for the global information and communication space. A vision that was reflected throughout the year in various international texts, such as the UN’s Global Principles for Information Integrity, the OECD Recommendation on information integrity, and the Global Digital Compact. “While some may have expressed doubts on the need to regulate digital platforms, the year 2024 seems to have brought everyone to the table on the issue of information integrity, an approach inspired by the founding text of our organization: the International Declaration on Information and Democracy. But we still have many battles to fight to avoid disaster, such as ensuring the political and ideological neutrality of the platforms that structure our informational space,” explains Camille Grenier, Executive Director of the Forum on Information and Democracy.

2022 Annual Report: The Symbolic Milestones of 50 Signatory States

From the adoption of the Digital Services Act (DSA) in Europe to the launch of chat GPT and Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter, 2022 has been a pivotal year.On the one hand, evidence that a regulation providing minimum guarantees for the information and communication space is possible. On the other, new technologies or governance changes which once again demonstrate that our democratic systems are not equipped to respond promptly to, if not anticipate, technological disruptions impacting our public space.