Media Sustainability: how to rebalance the market power of media in relation to Big Tech

The disruption of the media ecosystem and unfair competition driven in part by the move to a digital, mobile, and platform-dominated media environment jeopardizes the sustainability of journalism, which represents a major democratic danger.

A ‘potential extinction event’

Independent journalism is an essential force for democracy and open societies, but is facing an existential threat from a set of interlocking challenges that, in their scale, complexity, and systemic nature, is akin to its own version of the climate emergency. A hostile political environment at best, and an authoritarian resurgence at worst; declining revenues as a result of the move to a more digital, mobile, and platform dominated media environment; and fraying public trust has left journalism in a precarious state.

The crisis facing independent journalism is of historic proportions, and it requires those with the power and foresight to act to confront this crisis with an historic response. The industry is experiencing a ‘potential extinction event’ as the certainties (chiefly the advertising-supported model) under which journalism operated for 40 to 50 years fall away.

 

Our work on this theme

Policy brief

OSCE Policy Manual|Safeguarding media freedom in the age of Big Tech Platforms and AI – in partnership with the Forum on Information and Democracy

This Policy Manual highlights how the current digital information ecosystem — dominated by Big Tech platforms (very large social media and search engines, and increasingly also AI companies) — has become increasingly captured in ways that undermine media freedom. It underscores the need for democratic state intervention, based on the rule of law, to ensure an enabling environment for independent and pluralistic journalism.

The Manual offers a vision for healthy online information spaces, where the availability and accessibility of public interest information are ensured. It puts forward mitigation measures and key recommendations for States to implement long-term structural reforms and sustained investments to address the distortions in today’s online information ecosystem.

The recommended mitigation measures cover three key areas:
• Visibility of journalism and public interest information online
• Media viability and funding models that support public interest information
• Vigilance, or the online safety of journalists

The core of this Policy Manual lies in the guidance it provides on how to enable healthy information spaces online by freeing the ecosystem from heavily concentrated gatekeeping power, and instead fostering an enabling environment for media freedom in the algorithmic and artificial intelligence (AI) era.

It concludes that for media freedom to be safeguarded, addressing platform-related challenges alone is not sufficient. Instead, it calls for more ambitious structural reforms — to move beyond merely mitigating media dependency and towards building an independent, pluralistic online information and media landscape that can sustain democratic debate and societal resilience.

This publication is part of the project “Healthy Online Information Spaces – SAIFE Renewed”. It was produced in collaboration with the Forum on Information and Democracy.

Report

The Economic Imperative of Investing in Public Interest Media – Statement of the High-Level Panel on Public Interest Media

Rarely has the need for public interest media been greater. At a time of heightened economic uncertainty and political disruption, the economic and broader societal benefits provided by trusted and independent news organizations are more important than ever.

The Forum on Information and Democracy has convened a High-Level Panel of leading international economists. Their collective statement examines the drivers of this crisis and proposes a concrete plan of action for governments worldwide.

Their analysis not only discusses the political and democratic consequences of free information but also delves deeply into its economic significance – an aspect that has been largely overlooked until now.

Policy brief

Time for a new approach: A new policy brief calls for digital taxes to fund journalism

At the M20 Summit, an independent initiative focused on integrating media and information integrity into the G20 policy agenda, the Forum on Information and Democracy is releasing its new policy brief that examines the potential of digital service taxes (DSTs) to sustain quality journalism as the financial landscape of the media sector increasingly deteriorates.

 

Latest news on the same theme

Information integrity at COP30, what’s next to implement the Declaration?

The States of the Partnership for Information and Democracy and the Forum’s civil society Coalition gathered for an online meeting of the workstream on information integrity,…

Published on December 11, 2025

Information integrity at COP30: unpacking historic achievements

During COP30, a first group of States committed to promoting Information Integrity on Climate Change, and called for coordinated efforts by the international community, civil society…

Published on November 12, 2025

Twenty-nine Governments Join Forces in Defense of Access to Free and Reliable Information Worldwide: Historic Paris Declaration on Multilateral Action Lays Out Commitments by Leading Democracies

Paris, 29 October: Twenty-nine governments from around the globe convened at the 2025 Paris Peace Forum, including five Heads of State and Government, have committed to hold the line…

Published on October 30, 2025

Press Release: A global call from leading economists urge action to protect public interest media for economic prosperity and human progress 

As world leaders convene for the High-Level Week of the UN General Assembly in New York, eleven of the world’s leading economists, including two Nobel laureates,…

Published on September 22, 2025